Spending on experiences versus possessions advances more immediate happiness


Spending on experiences versus possessions advances more immediate happiness


According to new research from the McCombs School of Business at The University of Texas at Austin, some purchases are better at sparking happiness than others.

Lead author Amit Kumar, assistant professor of marketing, and his team of researchers revealed that consumers are happier when they spend on experiential purchases rather than material ones. The paper, "Spending on Doing Promotes More Moment-to-Moment Happiness than Spending on Having," is published in the May 2020 issue of the Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.

"One issue that hasn't really been examined much is what happens in the here and now -- are we happier spending our money on an experience or on a material item?" Kumar said. "The basic finding from a lot of experiments is that people derive more happiness from their experiences than from their possessions."

The team recruited 2,635 adults into the study, who were randomly assigned either a material or experiential group. The participants were sent random texts during the day to monitor emotions and purchasing behaviour. The material purchasing group bought things such as jewellery, clothing, and furniture, and the experiential group attended sporting events, dined at restaurants, or engaged in other experiences. The results showed that happiness was higher for participants who engaged in experiential purchases in comparison to the happiness of material puchasers in every category, regardless of the cost of the item.

"It would be unfair to compare a shirt to a trip, but when we account for price, we still see this result where experiences are associated with more happiness," Kumar said.

A second study was then conducted to address potential differences in types of consumers. In the second study, over 5,000 participants were asked to first rate their happiness and then report whether they had used, consumed, or enjoyed either a material or experiential purchase within the past hour. If they responded yes, participants were then asked a series of questions and details regarding their purchase.

"We still observed the same effect," Kumar said. "When the very same person was consuming an experience, that was associated with more happiness."

The team concluded that people are happier with experiential purchases over material ones, whether happiness is measured before, during, or after consumption. Experiential purchases also prompt more satisfaction despite people generally spending more time using material possessions. The researchers believe that a possible explanation is that experiences endure in people’s memories, while the perceived value of material purchases tend to weaken over time.

"If you want to be happier, it might be wise to shift some of your consumption away from material goods and a bit more toward experiences," Kumar said. "That would likely lead to greater well-being."

Journal Reference:

  1. Amit Kumar, Matthew A. Killingsworth, Thomas Gilovich. Spending on doing promotes more moment-to-moment happiness than spending on havingJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2020; 88: 103971 DOI: 1016/j.jesp.2020.103971



Loneliness can be defined in a number of ways, but most specialists agree that it is an undesirable and hurtful emotion, and can impact both physical and mental wellbeing.

A new study has discovered that the same part of the brain is involved in craving company and craving food. This supports the notion that socialising is a basic human need, much like eating.

How a sense of purpose leads to a long, happy and healthy life.

In a retrospective case study, Mayo Clinic researchers have found that antibiotics administered to children younger than 2 are associated with several ongoing illnesses or conditions, ranging from allergies to obesity.

The COMPLEMENTARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (The CMA) © 2012. No part of this site may be reproduced without the express permission of The Complementary Medical Association. If used without prior consent a charge of US $1,000 per article, or mini section is paid (US $50 per word (minimum) will be charged. This is not meant to reflect a commercial rate for the content, but as a punitive cost and to reimburse The CMA for legal fees and time costs). Use of the contents, without permission will be taken as consent to bill the illegal user in full.